Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Our Latest Guide

On Demand Webinar

Posts by category

Follow Me

New Programs


Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

5 Tips for Facilitating Effective Performance Reviews


Performance ReviewUtter “performance review” and watch the faces sour. The reaction is not without good reason either. The stereotypical performance review often feels like a top-down, mechanically delivered assessment: The employer does the talking while the silent employee is picked apart…which is precisely why they have such a bad reputation.

But performance reviews don’t have to be painful; in fact, they can even be something that both employee and employer look forward to. Here are 5 tips to make your performance review not only painless, but productive.

5 Tips for Facilitating Effective Performance Reviews

1. Look at performance reviews as an opportunity to enter into a partnership
When you skip the antiquated, top-down model and instead address your employees’ feelings and frustrations, you’ll see more buy in. And more often than not, you’ll also see changes in their behavior and productivity which is ultimately the point of a performance review in the first place, isn’t it? People respond to tactless criticism in kind. However, if your employee senses that you understand her point of view—even if you do not agree with it—you will more easily be able to coach her and offer suggestions for how she might do things differently.

2. Base your review on specific and documented observations
You’re busy, but running a performance review off the cuff is unproductive. It can also be disastrous. All employers essentially want the same thing: Happy, productive workers and a profitable business. But a carelessly run review undermines these goals; it can also cause one of your most valuable employees to rethink their devotion to the company and you.

    Keep a working file and include a list of every employee’s significant accomplishments (and shortcomings). Also include a detailed description of the employee’s job and what it would look like if it was performed exactly right. Doing this will provide you with a rubric for evaluating each employee; you’ll also be able to use it as a coaching device to model how your employee could improve.

    3. Schedule interim performance reviews
    Like all relationships, the ones you have with employees need to be maintained and nurtured. If we all share a common goal (to have happy, productive employees), why would we evaluate their happiness and productivity only once a year? Instead, try scheduling informal monthly reviews to establish and assess goals. If you think of these as collaborative, give-and-take conversations, there’s little to dread.

    4. Set the right tone
    Before you begin the performance review, ease into it with some small talk. It’s true, small talk often lacks substance or meaning—but it doesn’t have to.

    Skip talking about the weather or sports. Unless you are both weatherman and sportscaster, it’s unlikely that beginning a meeting by talking about either relates to your shared experiences. Instead, start with questions like this:

    • How does it feel to have completed the __________ project? I imagine that was quite an undertaking.
    • Last week, you mentioned you were going to be vacationing in Florida this October. That will be a great trip. Have you ever been there before?
    5. Focus on an agenda and encourage employee feedback
    No one likes surprises in a performance review, so preface your conversation with an agenda and solicit feedback as you do this. You might say something like this:

    “Here’s what I was thinking we’d do: First, I’d like to give you a summary of the review; then we can cover the details of your strongest points. After that, we can talk about areas where you might improve. Lastly, based on your feedback and on some of my ideas, I’d like to collaborate on setting some future goals and work together to figure out the best way to achieve them. As I’m going through some of this, I want you to feel free to comment and ask questions if you think of any.”

    Effective performance reviews often have as much to do with what happens before “the conversation” as it does during “the conversation.” It’s going to be difficult to solicit feedback and openness if you haven’t been open or established a relationship with your employees before the review.

    If you're looking for affordable human resource masters programs, learn more about Marygrove College's online Master of Arts degree in Human Resource Management (HRM)

    You might also be interested in knowing that we have reduced tuition by 19 percent for the 2012-2013 academic year! 




    It's not a partnership if one person is judging another. To even say it is when it isn't is intellectually dishonest. Measuring the accomplishments of an employee is a measure of how the system is impacting the employee. It's not really about the individual. It's a complex system not a linear cause and effect.
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 5:51 AM by Wally Hauck
    Thanks for commenting, Wally. You may have to expound on your response though. Where you lose me is with the word "judge," which is the absolute antithesis of "partnership." This may be your point though.  
    Judgment is the embodiment of law, hierarchy and power, which really gets at the heart of why (at least for us) performance reviews are ineffective and dreadful.  
    A partnership, however, leaves wiggle room for discourse, understanding and teachable moments. It strikes me that all businesses need this if they want to nurture an employee's potential. How does "judgment," and a hierarchical approach to delivering it facilitate this growth? 
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 8:35 AM by Ryan
    Ryan: Thank you for this interaction. I apologize for not being totally clear in such a short message. I used "judge" because the typical appraisal has a grade assigned to the employee by the manager. This puts the manager inn a position of a judge. We can call it a partnership but calling a pig a dog does not make it so. The key for me is to eliminate the grade portion of the appraisal. If you don't, then you have one person in control of the other and even if it s benevolent dominance it is still dominance. One person having control over the career, the pay, or the reputation of another cannot, by definition, be a true partnership.
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 1:11 PM by Wally Hauck
    This is very well put, Wally. Thanks for clearing this up.  
    I totally side with you here: "The key for me is to eliminate the grade portion of the appraisal. If you don't, then you have one person in control of the other and even if it s benevolent dominance it is still dominance."  
    Thanks again for reading and commenting!
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 1:14 PM by Ryan O'Rourke
    Great tips! We've also blogged on the topic. Would love to have you check out our post.
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 2:34 PM by Luisa Barone Gantt
    Thanks for commenting, Luisa. I took a minute to check out your site. Nice work.
    Posted @ Monday, September 10, 2012 2:45 PM by Ryan O'Rourke
    Ryan, by definition when you give someone a grade on a typical performance review you are judging their performance. In fact, by definition the typical review is a judgement of performance and behaviors and/or characteristics of another. you can call it a partner ship but it is still a judgement. You can put perfume on a pig but it will still stink.
    Posted @ Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:48 AM by Wally Hauck
    Posted @ Thursday, April 02, 2015 3:30 AM by Eko
    nice info 
    Hi there, constantly i used to check web site posts here early in the dawn, 
    since i enjoy to learn more and more 
    MetroWorld Host, Solusi web hosting terbaik untuk blogger 
    Tempat Kursus website, SEO, Desain Grafis Favorit 2015 di jakarta
    Posted @ Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:31 AM by Tempat Kursus website, SEO, Desain Grafis Favorit 2015 di jakarta
    Post Comment
    Website (optional)

    Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics